<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Jesus was God, why did he pray to himself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/</link>
	<description>Happy are those who ask questions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: #Joe</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19822</link>
		<dc:creator>#Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19822</guid>
		<description>Hey so I came across this interesting audio clip. It&#039;s a guy by the name of Erwin McManus teaching on hell. I don&#039;t know whether you guys will like what he says or dislike what he says, but that&#039;s not really my concern. What&#039;s important is that I do think you&#039;ll find it interesting. Also, I think you&#039;ll probably find Erwin to be a rather respectable guy rather than some of the arrogant, harsh, and misrepresenting christians we&#039;ve talked about. Anyways, If you&#039;ve got the time, and think it may be of interest give it a listen. Just copy and paste this into your browser. It&#039;s just a streaming audio clip. http://mosaic1.edgeboss.net/download/mosaic1/lifes-toughest/audio/02-life-questions.mp3?ewk13=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey so I came across this interesting audio clip. It&#8217;s a guy by the name of Erwin McManus teaching on hell. I don&#8217;t know whether you guys will like what he says or dislike what he says, but that&#8217;s not really my concern. What&#8217;s important is that I do think you&#8217;ll find it interesting. Also, I think you&#8217;ll probably find Erwin to be a rather respectable guy rather than some of the arrogant, harsh, and misrepresenting christians we&#8217;ve talked about. Anyways, If you&#8217;ve got the time, and think it may be of interest give it a listen. Just copy and paste this into your browser. It&#8217;s just a streaming audio clip. <a href="http://mosaic1.edgeboss.net/download/mosaic1/lifes-toughest/audio/02-life-questions.mp3?ewk13=1" rel="nofollow">http://mosaic1.edgeboss.net/download/mosaic1/lifes-toughest/audio/02-life-questions.mp3?ewk13=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19710</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19710</guid>
		<description>_
&#124;_&#124; &lt;-- Can of worms

 /
&#124;_&#124; &lt;-- Opened can of worms.

This is where the rubber meets the road, tradition of men meets Word of God and confusion is heaped upon confusion.  But are you willing to shed the blinders and see clearly:  are you willing to accept the Truth?

Keep asking questions.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_<br />
|_| &lt;&#8211; Can of worms</p>
<p> /<br />
|_| &lt;&#8211; Opened can of worms.</p>
<p>This is where the rubber meets the road, tradition of men meets Word of God and confusion is heaped upon confusion.  But are you willing to shed the blinders and see clearly:  are you willing to accept the Truth?</p>
<p>Keep asking questions.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #Joe</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>#Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>-Verbifex and Chicken

I agree, we must bridge the gap between belief systems. The classic phrase of &quot;agree to disagree&quot; is so very applicable. Disagreement does not need to become a cause for dislike. I, as yourself, am always in favour of civil debate, and information exchange, but this is the kind of thing that ought to be done peacefully, and there are far too many on both sides that seem to want to start a war.

-Chicken

As far as I know, the Christian scriptures do not say that by not believing in God you are dead to him. As far as I can tell that&#039;s just people making a poor representation of God and Christianity.  The way the Theology goes is that God is loving, and desires the &quot;lost sheep&quot;. He is the loving father who eagerly waits for the &quot;prodigal son&quot; and the loving shepherd that goes out and searches for the &quot;lost sheep&quot;. That hardly sounds like being dead to Him. When I hear stories of what some christians tell some people...I really feel that those christians need to study scripture more because they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about. What is true, is that according to the theology, if at the end of your life or at the end of the world you do not believe, then you are sent to hell (I&#039;m not preaching hellfire at you, I&#039;m just explaining the theology). However, the scriptures also say that He doesn&#039;t desire that &quot;any should perish&quot;. Meaning that although some will go to hell, it&#039;s not because He hates them, in fact, He would have much liked to have them saved, but by their own choice they have found themselves there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-Verbifex and Chicken</p>
<p>I agree, we must bridge the gap between belief systems. The classic phrase of &#8220;agree to disagree&#8221; is so very applicable. Disagreement does not need to become a cause for dislike. I, as yourself, am always in favour of civil debate, and information exchange, but this is the kind of thing that ought to be done peacefully, and there are far too many on both sides that seem to want to start a war.</p>
<p>-Chicken</p>
<p>As far as I know, the Christian scriptures do not say that by not believing in God you are dead to him. As far as I can tell that&#8217;s just people making a poor representation of God and Christianity.  The way the Theology goes is that God is loving, and desires the &#8220;lost sheep&#8221;. He is the loving father who eagerly waits for the &#8220;prodigal son&#8221; and the loving shepherd that goes out and searches for the &#8220;lost sheep&#8221;. That hardly sounds like being dead to Him. When I hear stories of what some christians tell some people&#8230;I really feel that those christians need to study scripture more because they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about. What is true, is that according to the theology, if at the end of your life or at the end of the world you do not believe, then you are sent to hell (I&#8217;m not preaching hellfire at you, I&#8217;m just explaining the theology). However, the scriptures also say that He doesn&#8217;t desire that &#8220;any should perish&#8221;. Meaning that although some will go to hell, it&#8217;s not because He hates them, in fact, He would have much liked to have them saved, but by their own choice they have found themselves there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19105</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 02:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19105</guid>
		<description>I must apologize.  Apparently, I have somewhere given you the impression that I care what you think.  If so, I am sorry, that was never my intention.  I don&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass what you or anyone else thinks.

As for &quot;calling me out&quot;.  Any time you feel really lucky, go ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must apologize.  Apparently, I have somewhere given you the impression that I care what you think.  If so, I am sorry, that was never my intention.  I don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass what you or anyone else thinks.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;calling me out&#8221;.  Any time you feel really lucky, go ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A chicken passeth by</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19103</link>
		<dc:creator>A chicken passeth by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19103</guid>
		<description>Well, as I suspected, most internet trolls and assholes are the same. Be it from the religious or the non-religious side. Seriously, the only problem here is not whether you&#039;re right or you&#039;re wrong, but that you&#039;re going a bit too far. 

This is as polite as I can get without outrightly calling you out. If you take it as an insult, fine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as I suspected, most internet trolls and assholes are the same. Be it from the religious or the non-religious side. Seriously, the only problem here is not whether you&#8217;re right or you&#8217;re wrong, but that you&#8217;re going a bit too far. </p>
<p>This is as polite as I can get without outrightly calling you out. If you take it as an insult, fine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19091</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 20:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19091</guid>
		<description>Well, I am goading you, too.  As I suspected, most atheists are no more capable of taking a joke than theists.  After all, you are both so close.  They only believe in one more god than you do.  ROFLMAO

You are really being a pompous ass, you do know that?

Not that I care for an instant what you or anyone else allegedly thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am goading you, too.  As I suspected, most atheists are no more capable of taking a joke than theists.  After all, you are both so close.  They only believe in one more god than you do.  ROFLMAO</p>
<p>You are really being a pompous ass, you do know that?</p>
<p>Not that I care for an instant what you or anyone else allegedly thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verbifex</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19090</link>
		<dc:creator>Verbifex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 20:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19090</guid>
		<description>Well, actually, you are creating a problem for other atheists. There is more at stake than arguments about the existence of gods.

Religion is not likely to go away any time soon, no matter how much abuse you throw at those who comment here. We have to live on the same planet with theists and, fortunately, most of them are decent human beings. We need to be able to talk with them and show them that we are not the monsters that their more zealous and ignorant co-religionists have painted. We need to show that nearly everything important to them is also important to us; we simply do not ascribe anything to spirits. We need, in fact, to engage the reasonable theists to keep the rabid ones in check. The only way to do that is to carry on civil discussions.

Civil discussions do not occur with someone whose only mode of address is invective. Whatever valid points a rude person makes are obscured by the noise of the insult and abuse; the signal-to-noise ratio is terrible. Civil discussions are rendered harder for others when such behavior is occurring in the same neighborhood; it is external noise for which no effective shielding is available.

Those same civil discussions may also help readers who have begun to doubt religion but are grappling with all the issues that theBEattitude and others have described; issues that apparently never bothered you but are very real to many people. Invective, with its terrible SNR, is useless for this or even counterproductive.

Now you tell us that you are creating this noise knowingly and on purpose for your own amusement without regard to its effect on other non-believers:&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, I admit I am deliberately trying to be a bit obnoxious about it. But it’s the only think amusing I find about religion. If we can’t have a little fun while we’re here. what’s the point?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We no longer have the luxury of imagining that your behavior is the result of limited or impaired intellect. We now know that you are intentionally goading theists.

Even ignoring its effect on efforts to educate about atheism and to improve relations with believers, this belligerence stirs up enmity, will confirm the stereotypes of non-believers that are spread by fundamentalists, and will make matters worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually, you are creating a problem for other atheists. There is more at stake than arguments about the existence of gods.</p>
<p>Religion is not likely to go away any time soon, no matter how much abuse you throw at those who comment here. We have to live on the same planet with theists and, fortunately, most of them are decent human beings. We need to be able to talk with them and show them that we are not the monsters that their more zealous and ignorant co-religionists have painted. We need to show that nearly everything important to them is also important to us; we simply do not ascribe anything to spirits. We need, in fact, to engage the reasonable theists to keep the rabid ones in check. The only way to do that is to carry on civil discussions.</p>
<p>Civil discussions do not occur with someone whose only mode of address is invective. Whatever valid points a rude person makes are obscured by the noise of the insult and abuse; the signal-to-noise ratio is terrible. Civil discussions are rendered harder for others when such behavior is occurring in the same neighborhood; it is external noise for which no effective shielding is available.</p>
<p>Those same civil discussions may also help readers who have begun to doubt religion but are grappling with all the issues that theBEattitude and others have described; issues that apparently never bothered you but are very real to many people. Invective, with its terrible SNR, is useless for this or even counterproductive.</p>
<p>Now you tell us that you are creating this noise knowingly and on purpose for your own amusement without regard to its effect on other non-believers:<br />
<blockquote>Yes, I admit I am deliberately trying to be a bit obnoxious about it. But it’s the only think amusing I find about religion. If we can’t have a little fun while we’re here. what’s the point?</p></blockquote>
<p>We no longer have the luxury of imagining that your behavior is the result of limited or impaired intellect. We now know that you are intentionally goading theists.</p>
<p>Even ignoring its effect on efforts to educate about atheism and to improve relations with believers, this belligerence stirs up enmity, will confirm the stereotypes of non-believers that are spread by fundamentalists, and will make matters worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19087</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19087</guid>
		<description>Ignore me?  I&#039;m sure he has chosen to do so.  Obviously, he has no answers to my questions and cannot come up with any decent response to my direct challenge to prove anything he has said or it disprove anything I have said.  What other choice is there but to pretend it never happened or else admit being wrong?  Clearly, admitting that there is no possibility of favorable evidence isn&#039;t acceptable to any theists, so just ignore all inconvenient questions and hope they go away.

Yes, I admit I am deliberately trying to be a bit obnoxious about it.  But it&#039;s the only think amusing I find about religion.  If we can&#039;t have a little fun while we&#039;re here. what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore me?  I&#8217;m sure he has chosen to do so.  Obviously, he has no answers to my questions and cannot come up with any decent response to my direct challenge to prove anything he has said or it disprove anything I have said.  What other choice is there but to pretend it never happened or else admit being wrong?  Clearly, admitting that there is no possibility of favorable evidence isn&#8217;t acceptable to any theists, so just ignore all inconvenient questions and hope they go away.</p>
<p>Yes, I admit I am deliberately trying to be a bit obnoxious about it.  But it&#8217;s the only think amusing I find about religion.  If we can&#8217;t have a little fun while we&#8217;re here. what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A chicken passeth by</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19085</link>
		<dc:creator>A chicken passeth by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19085</guid>
		<description>James, with your approach he has probably chosen to ignore you, and rightfully so. I would ask you not to lower yourself to the level of asshattery of some of them, but then I do it myself sometimes, so I&#039;m just going to tell you - ok, lay off, and save the snark for the more obnoxious ones (like the dolt I caught lying in God&#039;s name in that ages old thread.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, with your approach he has probably chosen to ignore you, and rightfully so. I would ask you not to lower yourself to the level of asshattery of some of them, but then I do it myself sometimes, so I&#8217;m just going to tell you &#8211; ok, lay off, and save the snark for the more obnoxious ones (like the dolt I caught lying in God&#8217;s name in that ages old thread.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A chicken passeth by</title>
		<link>http://thebeattitude.com/2010/01/28/if-jesus-was-god-why-did-he-pray-to-himself/#comment-19084</link>
		<dc:creator>A chicken passeth by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeattitude.com/?p=4464#comment-19084</guid>
		<description>Also, that reply was pretty neutral and not meant to favor anyone or stand up to anyone in any way. I don&#039;t condone rudeness in any form unless someone asks for it - however I also don&#039;t condone the &quot;make a claim and assume God and the Bible will back me up&quot; approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, that reply was pretty neutral and not meant to favor anyone or stand up to anyone in any way. I don&#8217;t condone rudeness in any form unless someone asks for it &#8211; however I also don&#8217;t condone the &#8220;make a claim and assume God and the Bible will back me up&#8221; approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
